From the archive: Just so you know, this article is more than 3 years old.
The approach of many training courses is to raise workers' awareness of risks and precautions and to impart knowledge about ways to respond to those risks that are most likely to protect. The final assumed or stated aim is to encourage behaviour that aligns with good practice.
Although there have been some serious efforts at investigating the return on investment from safety and health programmes -- from the ROI Institute, for example -- we tend to assume that more is better, and that increasing our training efforts will naturally yield greater effectiveness.
We don't always look at the efficiency of our approaches, sometimes because we know the regulator is less likely to scrutinise the quality of training than the quantity. So the agenda for site inductions gets longer, the sessions more tedious and less impactful, but resistance to reduction is fuelled by that perceived risk of "missing something important" that could be cited in court.
Training evaluation data often boils down to accident rates -- which are determined by a wide range of factors -- and some "customer" evaluation sheets, many of which do little more than summarise the quality of the coffee and biscuits provided.
When we plan a new initiative, we could consider how we will later report it
Recent research by construction equipment supplier Hilti has explored three aspects of short workplace training sessions: awareness; the "stickiness" of what was learned -- how much was remembered unprompted some time after the course; and whether the workers or their managers perceived the training to have affected behaviour.
This sort of investigation creates the opportunity to change the training, to try to enhance the desired outcomes. Training doesn't happen in a vacuum, and as an antecedent to the next phase of work it can have only a limited influence on behaviour, along with supervision, bonus arrangements and culture, among many other factors. But looking more closely at what works and investing in that is surely essential if we are to make the best of what will always be limited resources.
That is why IOSH's research programme is so important in funding researchers to identify current practices and initiatives and exploring the differences they make in the workplace. This is difficult to do since we never have perfect experimental conditions where everything is held static apart from one variable. Nevertheless, we all have a lot riding on the findings of these investigations because they guide us to the efforts we should make in the future to improve our workplaces.
One lesson from the formal research is that when we plan a new initiative, we could consider how we will later report it -- in a submission for an award, for example. This will encourage us to think how to track and measure the outcomes and will provide an explanatory narrative to our colleagues who participate in the training and our directors who authorise the budgets. Those case studies can win friends and influence people.
Companies with more than 50 employees must set out the hours when they do not expect employees to send or answer emails. The justification for the law is that workers were not being paid fairly for the unofficial overtime the evening and weekend correspondence involved.
In most cases a push for supply chain improvement, whether it was cutting energy and materials use or pollution control, balanced the stick with the carrot.Suppliers might be advised they would be expected to cut waste by a set percentage or to achieve accreditation for their management system by a certain date or they would lose a contract. But the client organisation often provided encouragement and advice to help them reach that point by the deadline.
UK broadcaster Cathy will facilitate two days of discussion at IOSH 2017, helping to fuel debate around the conference’s theme of transforming health and safety across the world.Cathy’s career to-date has seen her write regularly for The Daily Telegraph and front documentaries on topics as diverse as faith schools and police investigations.She has also hosted GMTV’s The Sunday Programme and served as the Financial Times’ chief political correspondent, media business correspondent at the Independent, and has also appeared on BBC TV panel show ‘Have I Got News For You’.
Cormac Gilligan, CMIOSH, is concerned about the millennial generation. Specifically, about how to hold on to the brightest and the best of those who reached adulthood since 2000.“It’s the talent conundrum that we generally have in our field,” he says, “how to engage the millennials – the oldest of them are entering their mid-30s now.”
Having won 11 Paralympic gold medals, held 30 world records and been crowned the winner of the London Marathon’s wheelchair race six times in her sporting career, Baroness Grey-Thompson now works tirelessly in the areas of disability rights, welfare and sport and has become an active crossbencher in the UK’s House of Lords.Her presentation at IOSH 2017 will open the second day of the conference, which is due to be held at the International Convention Centre (ICC), in Birmingham, UK, on 20-21 November.She said: “I am delighted to be speaking at IOSH 2017.