*UPDATE* Copy-out permit allowed Stanlow tank explosion
Friday 13th October 2017
From the archive: Just so you know, this article is more than 3 years old.
ESL Fuels, which owned the lower-tier COMAH site at Ellesmere Port where it manufactured fuel products, was fined £100,000, with costs of £17,000 awarded to the HSE, at Liverpool Crown Court over the incident.
In January 2015, waste oil contaminated with cobalt was being cleaned and converted into a clean energy source inside a 6 m-tall vessel (T 227) at the company's North Blend Tank Farm. Nitric acid had been added to remove the cobalt impurities and this caused the waste oil to start to foam and overflow from the vessel into a bund.
To prevent a potential catastrophic overpressure in the tank, ESL installed relief pipework to connect the vessel to an emergency dump tank (T 187) to capture the overflowing foam. T 187 had no vent system, however, and combustible gas built up inside the pipework and secondary tank, creating a flammable atmosphere.
On 19 January, two contract workers were inside the North Blend Tank Farm replacing existing pipework as part of a refurbishment project. They used an angle grinder to cut the pipework connecting the two vessels, which was still operational and not isolated.
The sparks from the grinder ignited the combustible gas inside T 187. No one was injured by the explosion but the vessel's lid detached and landed on a walkway.
The HSE's investigation found that the risk assessment and method statement submitted by the contractor -- and accepted by ESL -- were inadequate and subsequently formed the basis of the insufficient permit-to-work, which had been copied from one prepared the previous week.
The issuer had signed-off the permit that stated hot work would be carried out in the bund of T 227, where the ongoing waste oil treatment process was taking place, the HSE found.
HSE inspector Matt Lea said: "The contractor submitted a risk assessment and method statement for the refurbishment work but the [waste oil treatment] process configuration was changed, as was the route of the pipework. Much of this information was communicated verbally which provided scope for uncertainty and misunderstanding.
"So you've got a live process going on at the same time as refurb work which is not being safely controlled. There are ignition sources being brought into the area which have been accepted and ticked on the permit-to-work by ESL's issuer."
ESL complied with an improvement notice and the three prohibition notices served on it after the explosion. The company amended its permit-to-work system in line with the HSE's Guidance on permit-to-work systems: A guide for the petroleum, chemical and allied industries document (www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/hsg250.htm).
It had previously pleaded guilty to breaching ss 2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act.
During the waste oil recovery process at ESL Fuels’ north blend tank farm at Stanlow Oil Terminal, liquid started to foam and overflow from a storage vessel, Liverpool Crown Court was told.To temporarily remedy the issue, ESL used relief pipework to connect the leaking vessel to an emergency dump tank to collect foam. This caused combustible gases to build up and create a flammable atmosphere in the pipes and secondary tank.
In March 2015 two receptionists were ordered to clean the spa and swimming pool at Fredrick’s Hotel, Restaurant and Spa in Maidenhead. They began vomiting after 30 minutes and one of them passed out.In a separate incident another employee sustained burns while using a decarboniser – a heated stainless steel tank for cleaning equipment and utensils in commercial kitchens – which was running at 82°C. The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead said its officers visited the site and found staff had not been properly trained in the use of cleaning agents.
On 28 October 2013 contractor Anthony Hopkins visited the Sycamore Road store in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, to replace the filters in an air handling unit on a plant platform above a suspended ceiling in the warehouse. He fell almost 3 m through the ceiling, sustaining fatal injuries.An investigation by Adrian Monkhouse, principal environmental health officer at Rotherham Council, found there were no barriers to prevent falls from the platform. The area immediately in front of its access ladder was only 45 cm wide and cabling presented trip hazards.
In British criminal law, the employer has to look at the evidence that all reasonably foreseeable hazards were identified, and that all reasonably practicable controls were put in place. However, in civil law, vicarious liability is strict, with the organisation liable for what is done (or not done) on its behalf by employees.
The first part of the inquiry is to establish what happened, with a detailed timeline, how the response was organised and deployed, and the outcomes of dutyholders’ decisions and actions. The second part will explore the “why” questions.We have had significant disasters in the past and as Winston Churchill is reputed to have said, we should “never let a good crisis go to waste”. Learning the lessons and adopting preventive measures is part of the memorial to those who lost their lives and their families.
Andragogy, digibesity, people-centred safety; even to those with English as their first language, the global gathering of OSH practitioners in Singapore offered some potentially novel terms.Almost 3,500 delegates from more than 80 countries attended the 21st World Congress on Safety and Health at Work in Singapore’s Marina Bay Sands Convention Centre from 3 to 6 September.