Skip to main content
IOSH Magazine: Safety, Health and Wellbeing in the world of work - return to the homepage IOSH Magaazine logo
  • Visit IOSH Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit @ioshmagazine on Twitter
  • Visit IOSH Magazine on LinkedIn
How Jacobs keeps mental health in check
Th brilliance of resilience
January/February 2023 issue

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Browse previous issues
    • Member accolades
    • Member tributes
  • Health
    • Mental health and wellbeing
      • Bullying
      • Drugs and alcohol
      • Mental health
      • Stress
      • Wellbeing
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
      • Ergonomics
      • Manual handling
      • Vibration
    • Occupational cancer
      • Asbestos
      • Hazardous substances
      • Radiation
  • Safety
    • Incident management
      • Chemicals
      • Electricity
      • Fire
      • First aid
      • Slips and trips
    • Non-health related fatalities
      • Road safety
      • Work at height
    • Risk management
      • Confined spaces
      • Disability
      • Legionella
      • Lifting operations
      • Lone workers
      • Noise
      • Personal protective equipment
      • Violence at work
      • Work equipment
      • Workplace transport
  • Management
    • Human factors
      • Accident reduction
      • Behavioural safety
      • Control of contractors
      • Migrant workers
      • Older workers
      • Reporting
      • Safe systems of work
      • Sickness absence
      • Young workers
    • Leadership and management
      • Employee involvement
      • Management systems
    • Management standards
      • ISO 45001
      • ISO 45003
    • Planning
      • Assurance
      • Compliance
      • Emergency planning
      • Insurance
    • Rehabilitation
      • Personal injury
      • Return to work
    • Strategy
      • Corporate governance
      • Performance/results
      • Regulation/enforcement
      • Reputation
    • Sustainability
      • Human capital and Vision Zero
  • Skills
    • Communication
    • Personal performance
      • Achieving Fellowship
      • Career development
      • Competencies
      • Personal development
      • Professional skills
      • Qualifications
    • Stakeholder management
    • Working with others
      • Leadership
      • Future Leaders
  • Jobs
  • Covid-19
  • Knowledge Bank
    • Back to basics
    • Book club
    • Infographics
    • Podcast
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Products & Services
  • Management
    • Human factors
      • Sickness absence
      • Accident reduction
      • Behavioural safety
      • Control of contractors
      • Migrant workers
      • Older workers
      • Reporting
      • Safe systems of work
      • Young workers
    • Leadership and management
      • Employee involvement
      • Leadership
      • Management systems
    • Management standards
      • ISO 45001
      • ISO 45003
    • Planning
      • Assurance
      • Compliance
      • Emergency planning
      • Insurance
    • Strategy
      • Corporate governance
      • Performance/results
      • Regulation/enforcement
      • Reputation
    • Sustainability
      • Human capital and Vision Zero
  • Health
    • COVID-19
    • Mental health and wellbeing
      • Bullying
      • Drugs and alcohol
      • Mental health
      • Stress
      • Wellbeing
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
      • Ergonomics
      • Manual handling
      • Vibration
    • Occupational cancer
      • Asbestos
      • Hazardous substances
      • Radiation
  • Safety
    • Incident management
      • Chemicals
      • Electricity
      • Fire
      • First aid
      • Slips and trips
    • Non-health related fatalities
      • Road safety
      • Work at height
    • Risk management
      • Confined spaces
      • Disability
      • Legionella
      • Lifting operations
      • Lone workers
      • Noise
      • Personal protective equipment
      • Violence at work
      • Work equipment
      • Workplace transport
  • Skills
    • Communication
    • Personal performance
      • Career development
      • Competencies
      • Personal development
      • Qualifications
      • Professional skills
      • Achieving Fellowship
    • Stakeholder management
    • Working with others
      • Leadership
      • Future Leaders
  • Transport and logistics
  • Third sector
  • Retail
  • Mining and quarrying
  • Rail
  • Rehabilitation
    • Personal injury
    • Return to work
  • Utilities
  • Manufacturing and engineering
  • Construction
  • Sector: IOSH Branch
    • Sector: Northern Ireland
    • Sector: Midland
    • Sector: Merseyside
    • Sector: Manchester and North West Districts
    • Sector: Ireland East
    • Sector: Ireland
    • Sector: Edinburgh
    • Sector: Desmond-South Munster
    • Sector: Qatar
    • Sector: Oman
    • Singapore
    • Sector: South Coast
    • Sector: South Wales
    • Sector: Thames Valley
    • Sector: Tyne and Wear
    • Sector: UAE
    • Sector: West of Scotland
    • Sector: Yorkshire
  • Healthcare
  • Sector: Fire
  • Sector: Financial/general services
  • Sector: Energy
  • Education
  • Sector: Communications and media
  • Chemicals
  • Sector: Central government
  • Catering and leisure
  • Agriculture and forestry
  • Sector: Local government
  • Sector: IOSH Group
    • Sector: Financial Services
    • Sector: Sports Grounds and Events
    • Rural industries
    • Sector: railway
    • Public Services
    • Sector: Offshore
    • Sector: Hazardous Industries
    • Sector: Food and Drink
    • Sector: Fire Risk Management
    • Education
    • Construction
    • Sector: Aviation and Aerospace
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Categories
  • Sectors
  • Rehabilitation
  • Personal injury
Regulation/enforcement
Lexicon

D is for duty of care

Open-access content Wednesday 20th June 2018

Lexicon-D-is-for-duty-of-care

The question of to whom we owe a duty of care was extended by the "ginger beer" case of Donaghue v Stevenson in 1932. The initial judgment had been that Ms Donaghue could not seek compensation for her illness caused by the rotting snail found in the ginger beer bottle because she had not bought the drink herself.

However, the House of Lords held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to whoever consumed the drink if it was reasonably foreseeable that a failure to take care might lead to an injury. The duty of care was owed to all "persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question".

Feeding decaying gastropods to consumers of fizzy drinks is fairly obviously a lapse in your duty of care but there are limits on how far the duty extends.

Caparo, a business involved mainly in the steel industry, decided to buy shares in a company on the basis of an audit report prepared by accountancy firm Dickman. The report was not accurate about the profits of the company, causing Caparo to make a loss. The House of Lords appeal (Caparo Industries v Dickman, 1990) determined that, if anyone reading the report could claim for damages, this would open the floodgates to further claims, and an additional test of whether it is "fair, just and equitable to impose a duty of care" was introduced.

This was challenged by those who counted themselves as victims of the Hillsborough stadium disaster in 1989, not for being at the ground and involved in the crush that resulted in nearly 100 deaths and injuries to more than 750 people, but for the psychological harm they suffered watching the disaster on television. In the 1991 case against the chief constable of South Yorkshire police, the appeal judges ruled that, though it was foreseeable that those watching the football at home -- knowing their loved ones were in the crowds -- would suffer psychological distress, it would not be reasonable to extend the duty of care this far.

Feeding decaying gastropods to consumers of fizzy drinks is obviously a lapse in your duty of care

Duty of care is relative, not absolute. The greater the foreseeability and the greater the risk of harm, the greater the duty of care. In the 1951 case of Paris v Stepney, garage worker Mr Paris was using a hammer to remove a "u" bolt when a piece of metal flew off and blinded his one good eye. His employer was deemed to owe him a greater duty of care because the loss of his one good eye had a greater impact on him than a two-eyed worker losing a single eye. A similar principle runs through more recent cases of work-related stress -- once an employer knows that an employee has a stress condition, the duty of care obligation is greater than towards an employee who appears to be coping well with their workload.

In successful cases against directors, prosecutors can normally point to a decision by a director that contributed to the accident. Does a director who avoids safety and health issues stay out of the duty of care loop? In Leading Health and Safety at Work (bit.ly/1yjrgbq), the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) warns: "Directors cannot avoid a charge of neglect ... by arranging their organisation's business so as to leave them ignorant of circumstances which would trigger their obligation to address health and safety breaches."

In a case in 2012, in which three directors of Lion Steel Equipment were originally accused of the gross negligence manslaughter of an employee, the Crown Prosecution Service argued that the trio owed every employee a duty of care. This was regardless of their relationship with the employee or of their management responsibility for the safety system and safe place of work. This was never fully tested because the individual charges were dropped when the company pleaded guilty to corporate manslaughter.

However, it is clear that organisations cannot abdicate duty of care to consultants or contractors. A quarrying company charged with having inadequate risk assessments for respirable silica exposure thought that the consultant it had appointed could take the penalty. The consultant and the employer were both fined; the HSE principal inspector pointed out: "You cannot outsource your responsibilities -- the duty of care remains with you as an employer and the selection and use you make of consultants is crucial."

Attempts to extend an organisation's duty of care to those in their supply chain -- as in the case against Canadian retailer Loblaw and its auditor Bureau Veritas in relation to the loss of lives at the Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh -- have so far been unsuccessful. However, as similar cases are brought, organisations would be smart to consider a wider scope for their duty of care.

Topics
Personal injury
Regulation/enforcement
Lexicon

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Health, Safety and Environmental Systems Administrator

Plymouth
£25000 - £30000 per annum + Excellent Benefits
Reference
5452813

Interim Health and Safety Manager

Norwich
Up to £375.00 per day
Reference
5452812

Health, Safety, Environment and Quality Advisor

City of Westminster
Up to £50000 per annum + Car & Excellent Benefits
Reference
5452811
See all jobs »

Today's top reads

Sign up for regular e-alerts

Receive the latest news and features, free to your inbox

Sign up

Subscribe to IOSH magazine

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
IOSH Covers
​
FOLLOW US
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel +44 (0)20 7880 6200
​

IOSH

About IOSH
Become a member
IOSH Events
MyIOSH

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to IOSH magazine
Write for IOSH magazine

IOSH Magazine

Health
Safety
Management
Skills
IOSH Jobs

© 2023 IOSH • IOSH is not responsible for the content of external sites

ioshmagazine.com and IOSH Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ