Call to end safety deregulation after Grenfell Tower blaze garners wide support
Monday 26th June 2017
From the archive: Just so you know, this article is more than 3 years old.
Before the letter was sent to 10 Downing Street on 21 June the total number of signatories was 70, including the initial sponsoring organisations: Park Health and Safety, IOSH, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents and the British Safety Council.
They were joined by 66 more leading safety bodies and practitioners, such as the Association for Project Safety, Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, Civil Engineering Contractors Association, International Institute of Risk and Safety Management, National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health, Trades Union Congress and Unite the Union. The number has since risen to ten times that number and signatories include former health and safety minister Lord McKenzie of Luton and Dr Joanna Wilde, director of the Council for Work and Health.
The letter calls for a shift in the government's approach to safety and health regulation and fire risk management: "Arbitrary rules were imposed to establish deregulation of health and safety, such as a requirement to abolish two health and safety regulations (and more recently, three) for any new one adopted," it says.
"This mind-set has meant that, even when it was recommended and accepted that mandatory fitting of sprinklers would make homes or schools safer, this was rejected in favour of non-regulatory action. In practice, this approach favours inaction.
"At this crucial time of national reflection and sorrow, we urge all politicians to re-emphasise the need for effective health and safety regulation and competent fire risk management. These are fundamental to saving lives and sustaining our communities."
It also urges the UK government to complete its review of part B of the Building Regulations 2010, which cover fire safety within and around buildings in England, as a matter of urgency and to include a focus on improved safety in the forthcoming parliament.
The letter was first proposed by Lawrence Waterman, managing partner of Park Health and Safety Partnership, former head of safety at the 2012 London Olympics, and IOSH Magazine columnist.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme on 23 June, Waterman said the policy of scrapping three regulations for every new one enacted reflected "this atmosphere that health and safety is always about red tape. We never talk about white tape or gold tape and the way in which good health and safety enables good business.
"We have this approach that part B of the Building Regulations is not going to be updated and this has happened for years [despite] advice from the all-party Fire Safety and Rescue Group," said Waterman. "So it's the overall atmosphere that we are questioning."
In an open letter to Prime Minister Theresa May, more than 70 leading organisations and figures from the UK’s safety and health profession, including IOSH, the British Safety Council and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, have asked her to “scrap the government’s approach to health and safety deregulation and think again”.
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has launched a public consultation on the changes, which have been put forward to support the Workplace Safety and Health 2018: A national strategy for workplace safety and health in Singapore (WSH 2018).
IOSH, the British Safety Council and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents are among those organisations that have called on the government for a “change in mindset” towards safety regulations since the blaze in the 24-storey social housing block on 14 June, which killed at least 80 people.They sent an open letter to Theresa May on 21 June, urging the government to scrap safety and health deregulation.
In preparation for the change, the head of safety at a university took his freshly drawn-up set of fire risk assessments to his local fire authority, which previously had the task of certifying the premises, and asked if an officer familiar with the campus would give an informal opinion on whether they were sufficient or needed more work.When reminded that it was no longer the fire service’s job, the OSH head persisted until the officer told him: “If you have a fire and we prosecute you afterwards, then you’ll know your assessment wasn’t good enough.”
London’s underground railway is one of the busiest mass transit systems in the world, carrying four million passengers a day – five million at peak, more than the population of the Republic of Ireland. Trains on the busiest of its 11 lines run on average every 100 seconds.
According to the organisation, which represents workers at EU level, “there have been reports from trade unions that existing rights to consultation with workers are often ignored, and safety and health enforcement agencies are failing to take action to rectify this”.
A Belfast-based Risk & Compliance software provider has been collaborating with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and construction giant Costain as part of an ongoing project to unlock artificial intelligence’s (AI) potential in improving the management of risks on worksites.
IOSH and award-winning content marketing and publishing agency Redactive today announced a new partnership to provide news, updates, insight, careers advice and job opportunities for safety and health’s largest professional community.
Safety interventions should be practicable and cost-effective, but too much of an imbalance towards safety does not make economic sense for employers, argues Geoff Vaughan, who suggests ‘gross disproportion’ provides a practical limit.
A proposed new law aims to revoke EU-derived legislation, including life-saving protections, by December 2023, unless specifically kept or replaced – Richard Jones CFIOSH explains how OSH practitioners can get involved.