Health and Wellbeing at Work 2018
Avoiding the temptation to put fashion before function, the 100-year life and pets in the office featured at this year’s event.
“It’s lovely to have a salad bar, but not if you have to wade through carcinogens to get to it,” said Peter Brown, head of the Health and Safety Executive’s health and work programme.
In one of the first sessions of this year’s Health and Wellbeing at Work conference in Birmingham on 6 March, Brown noted that good employers prioritise controlling serious health hazards over the softer wellbeing measures once described by BT Group’s chief medical officer Paul Litchfield as “fruit and pilates”.
Brown rehearsed the HSE’s current priority areas for health management: reducing lung disease, musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and work-related stress. He said the executive was refining its guidance on the legal duty to manage stress. Asked by a delegate why the HSE had not enforced that duty, Brown said that “there is some evidence that if you go down the ‘stick’ route it does more damage than good”, suggesting that HSE prosecutions might be more likely to be unsuccessful because of the multifactorial nature of stress.
Doggy day care
There is no lack of research on the positive effect of pet ownership on individual wellbeing but few organisations have tried to translate that benefit to the workplace. An exception is food and confectionery maker Nestlé, with its pets at work (PAW) programme, as June Clark, health and wellbeing manager, explained to delegates at the Health and Wellbeing at Work conference. The pets in question are all dogs, 120 of them, which come to work with their owners.
The programme started in Nestlé’s Purina pet food division but when that business’s staff moved into the group headquarters at Gatwick in Sussex in 2012, requests from other workers to bring in their dogs began to grow.
“We did what everyone does, we did a survey,” said Clark. The results showed 83% of employees were in favour of extending the scheme to all staff.
All dogs must pass a behaviour test and health check, developed with the advice of the Kennel Club, before they are granted a “passpawt” to allow them entry to the office.
The office layout, designed with the help of an allergy specialist, allows those with health concerns or canine phobias to bypass the dog-filled work areas – even the lifts are divided between dog-friendly and dog-free – and carpets in the open plan workspace are deep cleaned weekly.
Nestlé’s research suggests the scheme improves the work environment for most employees with and without dogs and has raised productivity at the Gatwick office.
In a later session on employment law, Anthony Gold Solicitors’ managing partner David Marshall made a similar point. Though 500,000 UK workers report suffering from work-related stress, anxiety and depression and 11.7 million working days are lost to these conditions each year, Marshall said few people affected seek to bring claims in court, and even fewer succeed.
To establish an employer’s legal liability, the claimant must show that the “adverse reaction” they had to excessive pressure placed on them “led to a recognised psychiatric injury”, he said.
The claimant must also prove the employer could have reasonably foreseen the harm, for example if the employee had an earlier breakdown, or if other staff from a comparable team had been off work sick and that the organisation’s alleged breach of duty caused the injury.
The latter may sound obvious, said Marshall, but in Hatton v Sutherland  it was established the claimant “must show that that breach of duty had caused or materially contributed to the harm suffered. It is not enough to show that occupational stress has caused the harm.”
He said that if the employee would probably have developed a psychiatric condition anyway, minimal money damages could be awarded.
“A judge might find that, even if the breach was foreseeable and it did cause damage, it might well have happened anyway because effectively that person is very fragile. That’s a defence that can be used,” said Marshall.
Bang for buck
Peter Brown’s warning not to get carried away with the more fashionable aspects of wellbeing provision at the expense of more pressing concerns was symptomatic of a note of caution running through some of the presentations.
50% of older workers with a musculoskeletal condition will have persistent anxiety or depression
Hilary Norbury, the UK government Home Office’s health and wellbeing strategic lead, described her work in 2017 to draw up an evidence-based strategy. After reading research published by organisations including IOSH, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and the World Health Organization, she said she had not included employee health checks, flu vaccinations or mindfulness as there was no robust evidence for their efficacy.
Alaana Linney, director of business development at Nuffield Health, urged businesses to scale back on the health and wellbeing initiatives they ran and be better at running the ones in which they do invest. She cited VitalityHealth’s Britain’s Healthiest Workplace survey which found that although, on average, companies invested in 30 health and wellbeing initiatives each year, individual employees were only aware of ten and only engaged in three. She said investment in health and wellbeing strategies “should really follow risk”.
Linney added that businesses should use data to inform strategy outcomes. However, she drew on a recent survey that Nuffield Health carried out with companies with more than 1,000 employees. This found that 30% of respondents did not collect any data on absence.
“It’s the biggest cost to their business and they are not measuring it,” she said. “What we also saw was that there was a direct correlation between them not understanding the most prevalent risks in their business.”
She said musculoskeletal conditions and “mental health felt like a really good place to start” when businesses are thinking about where to invest and where they can get positive outcomes. She said one in six employees who go off sick has a mental health condition while mental health and musculoskeletal conditions are often “inextricably linked”. “We find with older people, 50% of workers with a musculoskeletal condition will have a persistent anxiety or depression issue.”
The issue of multiple conditions among older workers came up again in a discussion between Dame Carol Black, the Department of Health’s adviser on improving the welfare of working people, and Dr Justin Varney, Public Health England’s lead for adult health and wellbeing, about the work implications of ageing and a working world in which the “100-year life” becomes the norm.
“More and more we are seeing patients with cancer and cardiac disease,” said Varney. More older workers will mean more frail workers, whose capacity to “bounce back” after illness is diminished, said Black. “We used to think frailty only happened to the very old,” she said, “but it is now found in 50 and 60 year olds. She suggested employers will have to concentrate more on maintaining good health among their 20- to 40-year-old workers to set them up for longer working lives.
Victoria Sloan, internal communications business partner at Anglian Water, highlighted the mental health strand in the utility company’s wellbeing strategy.
Sloan said the strategy has been supported by a series of monthly campaigns. November’s campaign focus on suicide had to be scaled back, she said, when planning revealed how unprepared both managers and employees were to talk about the issue. To help start conversations, the company distributed coasters in public areas with helpline contact numbers and facts about suicide.
The company plans to put all its senior staff through mental health training this year. She added that Anglian Water had been voted second best place to work in the UK in 2017 on the Glassdoor website, which enables employees and former employees to review companies and their managers anonymously.
Keeley Downey is assistant editor of IOSH Magazine