Skip to main content
IOSH Magazine: Safety, Health and Wellbeing in the world of work - return to the homepage IOSH Magaazine logo
  • Visit IOSH Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit @ioshmagazine on Twitter
  • Visit IOSH Magazine on LinkedIn
Gender equality
Practice meets perfect
May/June 2023 issue

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Browse previous issues
    • Member accolades
    • Member tributes
  • Health
    • Mental health and wellbeing
      • Bullying
      • Drugs and alcohol
      • Mental health
      • Stress
      • Wellbeing
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
      • Ergonomics
      • Manual handling
      • Vibration
    • Occupational cancer
      • Asbestos
      • Hazardous substances
      • Radiation
  • Safety
    • Incident management
      • Chemicals
      • Electricity
      • Fire
      • First aid
      • Slips and trips
    • Non-health related fatalities
      • Road safety
      • Work at height
    • Risk management
      • Confined spaces
      • Disability
      • Legionella
      • Lifting operations
      • Lone workers
      • Noise
      • Personal protective equipment
      • Violence at work
      • Work equipment
      • Workplace transport
  • Management
    • Human factors
      • Accident reduction
      • Behavioural safety
      • Control of contractors
      • Migrant workers
      • Older workers
      • Reporting
      • Safe systems of work
      • Sickness absence
      • Young workers
    • Leadership and management
      • Employee involvement
      • Management systems
    • Management standards
      • ISO 45001
      • ISO 45003
    • Planning
      • Assurance
      • Compliance
      • Emergency planning
      • Insurance
    • Rehabilitation
      • Personal injury
      • Return to work
    • Strategy
      • Corporate governance
      • Performance/results
      • Regulation/enforcement
      • Reputation
    • Sustainability
      • Human capital and Vision Zero
  • Skills
    • Communication
    • Personal performance
      • Achieving Fellowship
      • Career development
      • Competencies
      • Personal development
      • Professional skills
      • Qualifications
    • Stakeholder management
    • Working with others
      • Leadership
      • Future Leaders
  • Jobs
  • Covid-19
  • Knowledge Bank
    • Back to basics
    • Book club
    • Infographics
    • Podcast
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Products & Services
  • Management
    • Human factors
      • Sickness absence
      • Accident reduction
      • Behavioural safety
      • Control of contractors
      • Migrant workers
      • Older workers
      • Reporting
      • Safe systems of work
      • Young workers
    • Leadership and management
      • Employee involvement
      • Leadership
      • Management systems
    • Management standards
      • ISO 45001
      • ISO 45003
    • Planning
      • Assurance
      • Compliance
      • Emergency planning
      • Insurance
    • Strategy
      • Corporate governance
      • Performance/results
      • Regulation/enforcement
      • Reputation
    • Sustainability
      • Human capital and Vision Zero
  • Health
    • COVID-19
    • Mental health and wellbeing
      • Bullying
      • Drugs and alcohol
      • Mental health
      • Stress
      • Wellbeing
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
      • Ergonomics
      • Manual handling
      • Vibration
    • Occupational cancer
      • Asbestos
      • Hazardous substances
      • Radiation
  • Safety
    • Incident management
      • Chemicals
      • Electricity
      • Fire
      • First aid
      • Slips and trips
    • Non-health related fatalities
      • Road safety
      • Work at height
    • Risk management
      • Confined spaces
      • Disability
      • Legionella
      • Lifting operations
      • Lone workers
      • Noise
      • Personal protective equipment
      • Violence at work
      • Work equipment
      • Workplace transport
  • Skills
    • Communication
    • Personal performance
      • Career development
      • Competencies
      • Personal development
      • Qualifications
      • Professional skills
      • Achieving Fellowship
    • Stakeholder management
    • Working with others
      • Leadership
      • Future Leaders
  • Transport and logistics
  • Third sector
  • Retail
  • Mining and quarrying
  • Rail
  • Rehabilitation
    • Personal injury
    • Return to work
  • Utilities
  • Manufacturing and engineering
  • Construction
  • Sector: IOSH Branch
    • Sector: Northern Ireland
    • Sector: Midland
    • Sector: Merseyside
    • Sector: Manchester and North West Districts
    • Sector: Ireland East
    • Sector: Ireland
    • Sector: Edinburgh
    • Sector: Desmond-South Munster
    • Sector: Qatar
    • Sector: Oman
    • Singapore
    • Sector: South Coast
    • Sector: South Wales
    • Sector: Thames Valley
    • Sector: Tyne and Wear
    • Sector: UAE
    • Sector: West of Scotland
    • Sector: Yorkshire
  • Healthcare
  • Sector: Fire
  • Sector: Financial/general services
  • Sector: Energy
  • Education
  • Sector: Communications and media
  • Chemicals
  • Sector: Central government
  • Catering and leisure
  • Agriculture and forestry
  • Sector: Local government
  • Sector: IOSH Group
    • Sector: Financial Services
    • Sector: Sports Grounds and Events
    • Rural industries
    • Sector: railway
    • Public Services
    • Sector: Offshore
    • Sector: Hazardous Industries
    • Sector: Food and Drink
    • Sector: Fire Risk Management
    • Education
    • Construction
    • Sector: Aviation and Aerospace
Quick links:
  • Home
  • IOSH Magazine Issues
  • Nov/Dec 2021
Features
Insurance
Regulation/enforcement
Personal injury

Litigation landscape in the UK

Open-access content Ben Rigby — Thursday 18th November 2021
From the archive:  Just so you know, this article is more than 1 year old.
web_p39_First-line-of-defence_iStock-518180852.png

OSH professionals are critical to establishing the compliance culture and safety management rules that will keep both civil and criminal litigation risk in the UK at bay. 

Keeping on top of litigation is a growing concern for organisations. How has the litigation landscape in the UK changed for OSH professionals, and where does mitigating risk sit in their priorities?

Ruth Wilkinson, IOSH head of health and safety, says health and safety management rests on good moral, legal and financial principles, protecting people and preventing harm, to which responding to litigation forms just one part.

Preventing financial costs, ‘understanding that a breach of health and safety statutes could result in a prosecution as well as a civil claim’ and safeguarding against reputational risks are important, she says. ‘But at the heart of it, it’s about people.’

Kevin Bridges, UK national head of health and safety at multinational law firm Pinsent Masons, says: ‘Any threat of future civil litigation and potential criminal prosecution, combined, is certainly an important driver for employers seeking to achieve compliance with health and safety law, and avoid litigation risk.’

In the UK, the costs of litigation can be significant; Kevin notes that, from February 2016, revised sentencing guidelines increased penalties for most offences, with fines of up to £10m for health and safety breaches, and up to £20m for corporate manslaughter (Sentencing Council, 2015). Litigation can be civil or criminal, but these fines are from criminal cases.

Risk perceptions

Perception varies as to whether criminal prosecution or civil litigation is the greater risk for corporates. Breaching a statutory duty can lead to prosecution under health and safety legislation, while breaching a civil duty of care may give rise to a damages claim. Each is judged to a different standard of proof.

Kevin explains: ‘To succeed in the UK, a civil claim for damages must be proved on the balance of probabilities: the claimant must prove that the employer owed them a duty of care; that the duty was breached; and that their injury and damages were reasonably foreseeable consequences of that breach.

'With prosecutions comparatively rare and often resolved in the magistrates’ courts, employers often plead guilty to secure lower fines and reduce costs'

‘While it has long been held that an employer must take reasonable care for the safety of his employees, that duty is not unlimited and will be discharged if the employer does what any reasonable and prudent employer would have done in the circumstances.’

For a criminal prosecution, the charge must be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Should an injury occur, employers are required to show they took all reasonably practical steps to avoid it but the accident still occurred regardless, demonstrating a statutory defence. Kevin notes: ‘The prosecution does not have to prove negligence for a conviction to ensue, provided that the employer’s failure is demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt.’

Criminal or civil?

Chris Jerman, thought leadership manager at IOSH, says that businesses arguably fear civil litigation more than criminal charges.

With prosecutions comparatively rare and often resolved in the magistrates’ courts, employers often plead guilty to secure lower fines, reduce costs and minimise media attention – even though, Chris says, they might have fought on successfully.

However, Kevin notes that being convicted can have severe consequences beyond a fine. Resulting regulatory investigations can affect ongoing business, prevent companies bidding for public contracts and generate damaging adverse publicity. ‘By contrast, a civil award of damages, while significant, and which may well attract some adverse publicity, is largely a matter between the parties and their insurers.’ He adds: ‘Although civil damages can be very high, the moral repugnance attached to a criminal conviction for failings – particularly where they relate to safety or health – remains a significant and increasing deterrent.’

Susan Dearden, head of legal at Finch Consulting, says: ‘Civil claims for compensation by employees are covered by [compulsory] employers’ liability insurance, so any rise in claims is felt by insurers rather than employers.’  

Criminal litigation is the bigger concern for businesses, she argues. ‘While defence costs may be covered by insurance, the penalties – and, usually, prosecution costs – are not covered by any policy. Liability therefore has a direct and immediate impact on the bottom line as well as a reputational impact.’

Chris agrees reputational issues are important. ‘A fear of negative press drives a great deal of organisational fear,’ he says. Kevin says the public and political will to hold those at fault to account for such failings to a criminal standard shows no sign of abating.

However, Chris notes that while OSH professionals might want to defend criminal claims, the relatively low levels of fines for summary offences can mean ‘financially, it’s just not worth fighting’, and ‘while OSH professionals should be at the forefront of such cases, they rarely are’.

However, OSH professionals should use their abilities to ensure court proceedings are a much less realistic proposition, ensuring inspectors recognise the public interest is not served by prosecuting. As such, OSH professionals should engage with the GB Health and Safety Executive to persuade inspectors that intervention is not needed, according to the circumstances.

Should OSH professionals focus more on protecting people rather than managing the risk of litigation? Chris says: ‘The focus should be on prevention, but through risk-driven and evidence-led means.’

Ruth says: ‘The primary driver for OSH standards is not solely about preventing potential civil litigation claims.’  

web_p41_Breige-Murphy.png

Case study: Paying for pain

Breige Murphy of Osborne Clarke explains how OSH professionals should manage musculoskeletal claims.

Musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) claims comprise two elements: general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity; and special damages for any financial losses incurred as a result of the injury.  

In England and Wales, general damages are assessed by reference to the Judicial College Guidelines and reported cases, with different brackets according to age, duration of symptoms, whether surgery is indicated and the prognosis for the future.

Special damages include past and future loss of earnings, medication costs, private surgery costs, care costs and so on. The case of Fifield v Denton Hall et al (2005) shows these damages can be significant. There, the court awarded the claimant, a typist, £11,500 for general damages and £84,500 for special damages as she was unable to work as a secretary again and required ongoing medical care. The damages relate to the High Court judgment, rather than the Court of Appeal hearing, where the High Court’s findings were upheld.

Lack of physical proximity is no excuse not to monitor an employee’s health while they are working from home. A recent survey revealed that 81% of employees working remotely had experienced back, neck or shoulder pain (Versus Arthritis, 2020).

With a surge in MSD claims foreseen, the ability to defend these claims will depend on documentary evidence of policies, risk assessments and training together with witness evidence corroborating implementation. Consider adopting the following practices:  

  • Written work assessments are key. Empower employees to conduct risk assessments of their home/office working environment. Online solutions are available. Review and implement the findings of the risk assessments.    
  • Monitor and review work levels and performance. Adopting flexible working hours against performance targets can reap benefits in terms of employee retention and loyalty.    
  • Invest in employee training on time management, mindfulness and problem-solving.    
  • If a work-related injury is reported, ensure prompt referral to occupational health or rehabilitation services. Symptoms treated early and successfully will limit the potential exposure to claims.

web_p40_First-line-of-defence_iStock-953465310.png

Building a compliance culture

Local authorities will want to prevent legal consequences and focus on compliance, with the first driver of OSH work being proportionate risk management ‘to ensure the health, safety and welfare of employees and others who could be impacted’, Ruth says.  

‘Competency for managers is also essential, as they will be responsible for day-to-day health and safety management,’ she notes.

However, Chris points out that ‘the way this is done is still largely very poor, and unfortunately fails to satisfy the requirements for good, solid joined-up defence for both criminal and civil actions’.

‘The format and quality of a great many risk assessments can be dreadful,’ he says, adding that health and safety management systems can be ‘a collection of disparate unconnected documents that leave too many gaps between them’ for a defence to succeed.

Breige Murphy, legal director at Osborne Clarke, agrees. She says there are two main reasons companies are unable to mount a successful defence to claims: a lack of documentary evidence of policies, procedures and training; and a lack of witness evidence corroborating implementation in the workplace.  

'Reforms to the no-win, no-fee system have shifted the burden of paying success fees from defendants to claimants'

Ruth says management should identify and manage OSH risks, performance of which ‘should be embedded within core business, with visible leadership and commitment, worker participation, and “plan-do-check-act” arrangements in place’.

Organisational compliance, she argues, should aim to go beyond achieving the minimum legal standard when controlling risks, as IOSH itself advocates, in striving to improve safety. ‘If the sole focus is about compliance, then organisations are limiting themselves in relation to business benefits and opportunities, and benefits to individuals and communities’, Ruth adds, noting that IOSH’s Healthy Profit policy statement does just that as part of sustainable business practices.

Likewise, Chris endorses IOSH’s Catch the Wave campaign as being informed by health and safety best practice as an intrinsic part of such issues, in favouring the prevention of accidents, rather than prescribing what to do when and if things go awry, such as litigation.

Litigation changes

Aside from the inevitable delays to court proceedings caused by the pandemic, Susan says changes to the fixed costs regime and pre-action protocol have ‘helped reduce costs in many cases and sped up resolution of claims’.

Reforms to the no-win, no-fee system have shifted the burden of paying success fees from defendants, who previously paid these should they lose a case, to claimants. However, Kevin notes that a shift in one-way costs, whereby defendants are liable for their own and claimants’ costs but not vice versa, ‘very much helps claimants, and encourages the bringing of claims’.

Another significant change in policy affects the relationship of civil claims to criminal ones, explains Kevin. Usually, civil cases await the outcome of criminal prosecutions. He explains: ‘Until October 2013, a criminal conviction for a health and safety failing could be determinative of a civil liability.’

Section 69 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 amended the law so there was no automatic civil liability following a breach of the health and safety regulations. Although employers could be prosecuted for criminal law breaches, any prosecution would not be determinative of an employee’s civil claim.

However, barrister Gordon Exall, of Kings Chambers, Manchester, says that lawyers are still awaiting the real impacts of the change. ‘Eight years later there is no definitive appellate judgment,’ he says, noting the government had made it clear the statutory framework would remain relevant as evidence of the standards expected of employers in future civil claims for negligence, including relevant risk assessments. ‘The duty to risk-assess and take steps based on that assessment will play a large part in determining the duties owed and whether an employer has been negligent,’ Gordon adds.

Despite the need to prove that negligence caused the injury for which damages are sought, Kevin concedes: ‘There is little doubt that a conviction to the criminal standard for a related offence will go some way towards this.’

He warns: ‘Clear evidence that an employer did not conduct appropriate risk assessments or ignored warning signs, which form part of a criminal conviction, will assist in demonstrating the required negligence in a civil claim.’  

In both instances, putting people first will be vital. ‘The strength of the defence relies on proving organisational competence,’ says Chris.

By confronting the risks of enforcement action, alongside prosecution or civil litigation, proactive litigation risk management provides clear benefits to businesses, individuals and society through safer and healthier working environments.

Managing litigation risk is not just a good thing to do – it is, fundamentally, the right thing to do, whether you are an employer or employee. After all, justice must not just be done, it must be seen to be done. And that means investing in positive change.

Image credit | iStock

References

Versus Arthritis. (2020) “Working from home left me with musculoskeletal pain” (accessed 16 September 2021).
 
Sentencing Council. (2015) Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline (accessed 16 September 2021).

IOSH NovDec21_Full (dragged).png
This article appeared in our Nov/Dec 2021 issue of IOSH Magazine .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

web_p31_A-beacon-pf-calm_Philip-White.png

 Interview: HSE's Philip White

Monday 1st November 2021
We speak with Philip White, director of regulation at HSE, about how the regulator has met the challenges of COVID-19.
Open-access content
web_p45_Starting-small_iStock-1268286233.png

 Sustainability pressures on SMEs

Wednesday 3rd November 2021
Sustainability is a high priority for big business, but what about the smaller companies that account for the majority of employment in the world? We look at the pressures on smaller businesses to prioritise the triple bottom line.
Open-access content
web_p70_Cassandra-Barrow_alamy_ER11WX.png

 Future Leader: the FA's Cassandra Barrow

Wednesday 3rd November 2021
Cassandra Barrow GradIOSH describes how the cloud of a COVID redundancy had a silver lining in the shape of an exciting new role at the FA, where she is embracing a broad range of OSH challenges while working to promote diversity and inclusion.
Open-access content
web_p22_A-crushing-Blow-CREDIT-Noma-Bar.png

 How to tackle violence in the workplace

Wednesday 3rd November 2021
Violence at work is a huge problem with far-reaching implications, and incidence has risen in some sectors since the pandemic. How can organisations make their working environments safer for the workforce?
Open-access content
web_p72_why-the-minds-matter.png

 Back to basics: understanding mental health and wellbeing

Wednesday 3rd November 2021
In the latest of our series exploring core OSH topics and your role in ensuring their risks are well managed, we focus on understanding mental health and wellbeing. 
Open-access content
web_p66_Sharing-the-wealth_Andrew-Baker_00003035_orange.png

 The value of being a mentor

Wednesday 3rd November 2021
A diverse career spanning the events industry – from the Olympics and Bollywood to music festivals and motorsport – is certainly an advantage for experienced mentor Richard Bate CMIOSH.
Open-access content
Topics
Features
Insurance
Regulation/enforcement
Personal injury
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Health and Safety Improvement Manager

Leeds
£35000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
5452992

SHEQ Systems Advisor

Up to £40000.00 per annum + Car Allowance
Reference
5452988

Senior Health and Safety Manager

Reading
Up to £65000.00 per annum + Great Car Allowance & Benefits
Reference
5452983
See all jobs »

Sign up for regular e-alerts

Receive the latest news and features, free to your inbox

Sign up

Subscribe to IOSH magazine

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
IOSH Covers
​
FOLLOW US
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel +44 (0)20 7880 6200
​

IOSH

About IOSH
Become a member
IOSH Events
MyIOSH

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to IOSH magazine
Write for IOSH magazine

IOSH Magazine

Health
Safety
Management
Skills
IOSH Jobs

© 2023 IOSH • IOSH is not responsible for the content of external sites

ioshmagazine.com and IOSH Magazine are published by Redactive Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ