Skip to main content
IOSH Magazine: Safety, Health and Wellbeing in the world of work - return to the homepage IOSH Magaazine logo
  • Visit IOSH Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit @ioshmagazine on Twitter
  • Visit IOSH Magazine on LinkedIn
Policy Highlights: How the landscape has changed
Member Interview: The next stage of Malaysia's health and safety plan
Digital Edition: Download the latest issue

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Browse previous issues
  • Health
    • Mental health and wellbeing
      • Bullying
      • Drugs and alcohol
      • Mental health
      • Stress
      • Wellbeing
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
      • Ergonomics
      • Manual handling
      • Vibration
    • Occupational cancer
      • Asbestos
      • Hazardous substances
      • Radiation
  • Safety
    • Incident management
      • Chemicals
      • Electricity
      • Fire
      • First aid
      • Slips and trips
    • Non-health related fatalities
      • Road safety
      • Work at height
    • Risk management
      • Confined spaces
      • Disability
      • Legionella
      • Lifting operations
      • Lone workers
      • Noise
      • Personal protective equipment
      • Violence at work
      • Work equipment
      • Workplace transport
  • Management
    • Human factors
      • Accident reduction
      • Control of contractors
      • Migrant workers
      • Older workers
      • Reporting
      • Safe systems of work
      • Sickness absence
      • Young workers
    • Leadership and management
      • Employee involvement
      • Management systems
    • Management standards
      • ISO 45001
    • Planning
      • Assurance
      • Compliance
      • Emergency planning
      • Insurance
    • Rehabilitation
      • Personal injury
      • Return to work
    • Strategy
      • Corporate governance
      • Performance/results
      • Regulation/enforcement
      • Reputation
    • Sustainability
      • Human capital and Vision Zero
  • Skills
    • Communication
    • Personal performance
      • Career development
      • Competencies
      • Personal development
      • Professional skills
      • Qualifications
    • Stakeholder management
    • Working with others
      • Leadership
  • Jobs
  • Covid-19
  • Knowledge Bank
    • Infographics
    • Podcast
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Products & Services
  • Management
    • Human factors
      • Sickness absence
      • Accident reduction
      • Control of contractors
      • Migrant workers
      • Older workers
      • Reporting
      • Safe systems of work
      • Young workers
    • Leadership and management
      • Employee involvement
      • Leadership
      • Management systems
    • Management standards
      • ISO 45001
    • Planning
      • Assurance
      • Compliance
      • Emergency planning
      • Insurance
    • Strategy
      • Corporate governance
      • Performance/results
      • Regulation/enforcement
      • Reputation
    • Sustainability
      • Human capital and Vision Zero
  • Health
    • COVID-19
    • Mental health and wellbeing
      • Bullying
      • Drugs and alcohol
      • Mental health
      • Stress
      • Wellbeing
    • Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
      • Ergonomics
      • Manual handling
      • Vibration
    • Occupational cancer
      • Asbestos
      • Hazardous substances
      • Radiation
  • Safety
    • Incident management
      • Chemicals
      • Electricity
      • Fire
      • First aid
      • Slips and trips
    • Non-health related fatalities
      • Road safety
      • Work at height
    • Risk management
      • Confined spaces
      • Disability
      • Legionella
      • Lifting operations
      • Lone workers
      • Noise
      • Personal protective equipment
      • Violence at work
      • Work equipment
      • Workplace transport
  • Skills
    • Communication
    • Personal performance
      • Career development
      • Competencies
      • Personal development
      • Qualifications
      • Professional skills
    • Stakeholder management
    • Working with others
      • Leadership
  • Transport and logistics
  • Third sector
  • Retail
  • Mining and quarrying
  • Rail
  • Rehabilitation
    • Personal injury
    • Return to work
  • Utilities
  • Manufacturing and engineering
  • Construction
  • Sector: IOSH Branch
    • Sector: Northern Ireland
    • Sector: Midland
    • Sector: Merseyside
    • Sector: Manchester and North West Districts
    • Sector: Ireland East
    • Sector: Ireland
    • Sector: Edinburgh
    • Sector: Desmond-South Munster
    • Sector: Qatar
    • Sector: Oman
    • Sector: Singapore
    • Sector: South Coast
    • Sector: South Wales
    • Sector: Thames Valley
    • Sector: Tyne and Wear
    • Sector: UAE
    • Sector: West of Scotland
    • Sector: Yorkshire
  • Healthcare
  • Sector: Fire
  • Sector: Financial/general services
  • Sector: Energy
  • Sector: Education
  • Sector: Communications and media
  • Sector: Chemicals
  • Sector: Central government
  • Catering and leisure
  • Agriculture and forestry
  • Sector: Local government
  • Sector: IOSH Group
    • Sector: Financial Services
    • Sector: Sports Grounds and Events
    • Rural industries
    • Sector: railway
    • Public Services
    • Sector: Offshore
    • Sector: Hazardous Industries
    • Sector: Food and Drink
    • Sector: Fire Risk Management
    • Education
    • Construction
    • Sector: Aviation and Aerospace
Quick links:
  • Home
  • Categories
  • Opinion
Regulation/enforcement
COVID-19

HSE Select Committee hearing on COVID: reading the room

Open-access content Wednesday 24th March 2021
Regulatory lawyer Rhian Greaves

Rhian Greaves

Regulatory lawyer Rhian Greaves gives her take on last week's Work and Pensions Select Committee hearing on COVID safety in the workplace, in which unions and MPs questioned HSE leaders on its response to the pandemic.

First – like so much of our national discourse – there was a clear disparity between the perception of the regulator (and the industry representatives) and that of the unions, with polar opposite views on display. 

The former talked about businesses trying to do the right thing, implementing familiar control measures in the workplace and with some success; HSE chief executive Sarah Albon indicated that the level of compliance with COVID measures had been 'significantly better' than is routinely the case with typical health and safety risks. The union representatives however felt the 'lived experience' of their members had not been reflected in the level of enforcement action taken and that there was an absence of any 'realistic chance of enforcement'.

We saw a similar divide emerge when the questioning inevitably turned to the categorisation of the risk as 'significant' rather than 'serious'. Both the TUC and Prospect very clearly felt this had impeded inspectors in their enforcement work. Prospect's general secretary, Mike Clancy, felt there had been a 'failure to read the room of civic opinion' on the part of the government and the HSE. 

Sarah Albon on the other hand, was equally clear that nothing in the HSE's Enforcement Management Model (EMM) – a 46-page guide to inspectors designed to standardise responses to workplace hazards, advising when to ‘engage’ employers and when to escalate to enforcement action – fettered an inspector’s discretion to take the action they thought appropriate to the risk. In reality? It is difficult to tell. What has been clear throughout the pandemic is that the HSE has been overwhelmed and under-equipped to deal with the central role thrust upon it. 

The resourcing problems faced by the HSE were inescapable throughout the course of the entire hearing. This was the one unifying thread of the morning. It ought to shock people that there are just 390 main grade inspectors. The ability to meaningfully regulate requires more boots on the ground, which in turn needs a sustained funding commitment from central government.

'Employers are living the COVID risk along with their staff in a way that they don’t normally do'

My own experience suggests that organisations have thought long and hard about their control measures and they have taken their responsibilities seriously. It was interesting to hear the HSE's director of field operations, Samantha Peace, pin this – at least in part – to the fact that employers are living the COVID risk along with their staff in a way that they don’t normally do. I agree with this and have seen this time and again when speaking to business leaders about their approach to COVID security. It has impacted them in a way that machine guarding or ladder safety typically hasn’t. It is my firm hope that the experiences we have all had with COVID will help engender a more positive health and safety culture as we emerge from the pandemic. 

Has the hard work and positive motivation of employers been enough to stop workplace transmission? No. And therein lies the difficulty for the HSE. 

Podcast episode 3Serving notices and beginning prosecutions are serious acts, alleging breaches of the criminal law. They are subject to well defined safeguards for and challenge by dutyholders who have had to adapt, adapt and adapt again as the government, the HSE and their trade bodies have almost continuously changed the goalposts as knowledge about the virus advances. 

What came through loud and clear is that the HSE is having to be cute with its limited resources. I suspect inspectors feel they can do more good and cover more ground in regulating by advice and co-operation than they can tying themselves up in legal paperwork to the exclusion of covering more businesses via inspection. It may be that this has played as much – if not more – of a part in the limited enforcement actions as the classification under the EMM.

Employers will certainly need more help as we emerge from this lockdown. Can we mandate testing? Can we require employees to be vaccinated? How long do we have to maintain social distancing? Can we remove some control measures as virus prevalence in the community drops? 

These are just some of the questions that are already swirling around. It was staggering therefore to find that the HSE doesn’t have a view on either lateral flow testing or vaccination, branding these 'employment law issues', commenting that the tests 'don’t have a place in the risk assessment process'. 

Sarah Albon said the agency hadn’t been involved in any of the discussions but acknowledged the complexity of the ethical issues involved. She is absolutely right that the issues are extremely complicated, but surely our health and safety regulator has to be a part of that challenging discussion? I find it difficult to entirely divorce these concepts from the wide ranging general duties imposed by the Health and Safety at Work Act.

Read more about the Select Committee hearing here.

Topics:
Opinion
Regulation/enforcement
COVID-19

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Health, Safety and Environmental Coordinator (EMEA)

£30000 - £35000 per annum + Excellent benefits
Reference
5448187

CDM and Health & Safety Consultant

Birmingham
£35k - 40k per year + dm c
Reference
5448186

Human Factors Consultant

Edinburgh
£35k - 50k per year + actor
Reference
5448185
See all jobs »

Today's top reads

Sign up for regular e-alerts

Receive the latest news and features, free to your inbox

Sign up

Subscribe to IOSH magazine

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
IOSH Covers
​
FOLLOW US
Twitter
LinkedIn
YouTube
CONTACT US
Contact us
Tel +44 (0)20 7880 6200
​

IOSH

About IOSH
Become a member
IOSH Events
MyIOSH

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to IOSH magazine
Write for IOSH magazine

IOSH Magazine

Health
Safety
Management
Skills
IOSH Jobs

Copyright © 2021 IOSH. IOSH is not responsible for the content of external sites.