From the archive: Just so you know, this article is more than 3 years old.
Traditional management models propose that extrinsic motivators (carrots and sticks) are effective ways for leaders to "control" people. Yet the science reveals these rarely provide long-term performance improvement. External motivating forces (especially financial rewards) tend to kill intrinsic motivation, generate cognitive dissonance, and reduce motivation as the reward becomes the key reason to do a task rather than the intrinsic enjoyment or sense of achievement.
Pink defines two types of people. Type X (extrinsic) is driven primarily by external factors -- such as money, fame, and status symbols. Many will be highly successful but can be troubled by an insatiable appetite for more "stuff" and more recognition. Type I (intrinsic) finds motivation comes from within -- in accomplishing something meaningful to them. Type I has been shown to have higher self-esteem, better interpersonal relationships and greater physical and mental wellbeing. People in this group usually outperform Type X in the long run.
Pink explains that reliance on extrinsic motivators at best crushes creativity, fosters short-term thinking and diminishes performance. At worst it encourages cheating, shortcuts and unethical behaviour as goals with huge bonuses attached lead to overly focused actions (witness the causes of the international banking crisis).
Humans have an inbuilt desire to develop, to become good at something. As they do, this mastery leads to a sense of personal fulfilment
Extrinsic motivators can be addictive: the more they are received, the more people expect them. This leads to the reward losing its motivational impact, requiring ever-larger prizes to maintain the effect. Notably, when rewards are withdrawn behaviour slumps.
For many, work becomes more complex and less routine. Concurrently there is a reduction in management levels for many organisations, requiring less hands-on leadership and more self-directed work. This requires a different approach from motivation.
When you consider what drives behaviour it's obvious: humans act on internal factors more than external, which is why some people spend hours learning a musical instrument for no financial gain and others leave highly paid jobs to become nurses or teachers. Success is measured by completion of the task, not by an added-on reward.
When basic needs (such as financial, fairness and adequacy) are met, people need something more. Humans have an inbuilt desire to develop, to become good at something. As they do, this mastery leads to a sense of personal fulfilment.
People also want autonomy (the freedom to do things in their own way) in four key areas: task, time, technique and teamwork. Studies show that perceived control is an important component of happiness and that a lack of freewill and choice reduces enthusiasm. A sense of autonomy has an immensely positive effect on attitude, job satisfaction and performance too. In the new world of work having a sense of purpose is a significant source of motivation and engagement (see Simon Sinek's Start with Why for more). According to Pink, if we understand people's mastery, autonomy and purpose we'll get more out of them and they'll feel happier at work too.
It is easy to find examples of extrinsic motivation in safety: celebrations, rewards and bonuses for periods worked without an accident and reporting of near-misses, for example. But as Pink states: "The problem with making an extrinsic reward the only destination that matters is that some people will choose the quickest route there, even if it means taking the low road."
As part of an emergency response team which also takes part in helideck operations, we are highly trained to be aware of the dangers both from helicopters landing and taking off, but also on how complacency could endanger us or passengers, or indeed a helicopter.
The most dangerous part of helicopter operations is taking off and landing, and indeed loading and unloading bags or passengers.
Human nature dictates that sometimes passengers can be blinkered to the dangers of the rotating blades and where to walk. So, it is the responsibility of the helideck crew to lead them safely to and…
Most health and safety programmes tend to default to safety because they are more often seen as a business priority, especially in higher-risk sectors. Safety is driven by legislation and regulation and organisations find it easier to show their commitment to safety because it is tangible and visible -- you can see hard hats, inspect records, documents and equipment. When you talk about health it tends to be the smaller component -- health programmes are sometimes included but they are not given equal measure.
It is fair to say that some industries are more focused on health than others,…
This isn’t a “classical business text” but, before you turn the page, hear me out. Tim Ferriss gave up the rat race and created a code for working less, earning more and having a blast. His book is a New York Times bestseller. But, you may ask: “How on earth can it apply to workplace safety and health?”
In The Power of Habit: why we do what we do in life and business, Charles Duhigg, an investigative reporter at the New York Times, explains why habits exist and how they can be changed. We learn how the right habits were crucial to the success of Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz and civil rights hero Martin Luther King and how implementing so-called "keystone habits" can make the difference between failure and success. And life and death. A principal reference is Paul O'Neill, who, when he became CEO of US industrial giant Alcoa in 1987, was very much a rookie in…